Features of national policy in approaches to electromagnetic field safety of radio frequencies radiation in different countries

Мұқаба

Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Аннотация

The article contains the analysis of modern approaches to determining the limits of the electromagnetic field of radio frequencies. The international discussion about the safe limits of electromagnetic radiation has been going on for half a century. In the 21st century, the national policy of electromagnetic safety is determined by the socio-economic priorities of countries and national legal principles of evidence of harm to health to a greater extent, than scientific data. There are three main approaches to determining the limits of electromagnetic fields. The Anglo-Saxon approach is based on the principle of passive regulation, i.e. using the recommended values of the permissible level of the electromagnetic field. The Soviet-Russian approach is based on establishing the maximum permissible level of the electromagnetic field, which guarantees no harm to present and future generations. The term of the maximum permissible level is historically associated with the concept of the priority of the nervous system responses to the influence of the electromagnetic factor. The state assumes responsibility for the scientific justification of the limit levels and implements the control functions for their observance, which allows excluding any harm to health. The third approach is based on the precautionary principle, the concept of which was first introduced in German law. It is aimed at preventing harm, in the absence of unambiguous, reliable scientific data and, in fact, it is a socially-oriented approach that takes into account social consensus in the context of the development of new technologies. Respectively, this approach implies strict maximum permissible levels (technically achievable), as well as a system of formal restrictions on placement of the electromagnetic field sources in the “susceptible” territories. Separately from the above approaches, a method of managing the safety of the electromagnetic environment in China has been formed: since 2015, electromagnetism has been fully attributed to environmental factors and is controlled by the Ministry of environmental protection. China has abandoned the hygienic regulation of the anthropogenic electromagnetic field, and the system, for establishing and monitoring the electromagnetic environment indices, combines elements of all three mentioned above approaches.

Авторлар туралы

O. Grigoriev

Center for Strategic Planning, Russian Ministry of Health; Russian National Committee on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection

Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: noemail@neicon.ru
Ресей

Mikhail Goshin

Scientific Research Center for Safety of New Technologies

Email: m.goshin@mail.ru

MD, Ph D , senior researcher, Department of environmental hygiene, Center for Strategic Planning, Russian Ministry of Health, Moscow, 119121, Russian Federation

e-mail: m.goshin@mail.ru

Ресей

A. Prokofyeva

Russian National Committee on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection

Email: noemail@neicon.ru
Ресей

V. Alekseeva

Center for Strategic Planning, Russian Ministry of Health; Russian National Committee on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection

Email: noemail@neicon.ru
Ресей

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Overviews on non-ionizing radiation. IRPA; 1977: 30.
  2. Protocol of the second Soviet-American workshop on the study of the biological effects of physical environmental factors. Seattle, Washington, June 11–15, 1979.
  3. Hygienic criteria for the state of environmentю. Iss. 16. Radio frequencies and microwaves. WHO: Geneva; 1984. 145 p.
  4. Schwan H.P. Classical theory of microwave interaction with biological systems. In: Taylor L.S. & Cheung Y., ed. Proceedings of a Workshop on the Physical Basis of Electromagnetic Interactions with Biological Systems., held at the University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 15–17 June, Rockville, US Dept of Health, Education, and Welfare. 400 p. (US DHEW document No. HEW-FDA 78-8055).
  5. Summary Analysis of the 2012 WHO Survey on Risk Management Policies regarding Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields. Background Paper Submitted for discussion at the WHO International Stakeholder Seminar on Radiofrequency Policies. Paris: France; May 2013: 68.
  6. Belpomme D., Hardell L., Belyaev I., Burgio E., Carpenter D.O. Thermal and nonthermal health effects of low intensity non-ionizing radiation: An international perspective. Environ Pollut. 2018; 242 (Pt A): 643–58.
  7. Volkow N.D., Tomasi D., Wang G.F., Vaska P., Fowler J.S., Teland F. et al. Effects of cell phone radiofrequency signal exposure on brain glucose metabolism. J Am Med Assoc. 2011; 305 (8): 808–14.
  8. Johansen C., Boice Jr., McLaughlin J., Olsen J. Cellular telephones and cancer – a nationwide cohort study in Denmark. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001; 93: 203–7.
  9. Divan H.A., Kheifets L., Obel C., Olsen J. Prenatal and postnatal exposure to cell phone use and behavioral problems in children. Epidemiology. 2008; 19: 523–9.
  10. Agarwal A., Desai N.R., Makker K., Varghese A., Mouradi R., Sabanegh E. et al. Effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic waves (RF-EMW) from cellular phones on human ejaculated semen: an in vitro pilot study. Fertil Steril. 2009; 92: 1318–25.
  11. Havas M. Radiation from wireless technology affects the blood, the heart, and the autonomic nervous system. Rev Environ Health. 2013; 28: 75–84.
  12. Saili L., Hanini A., Smirani C., Azzouz I., Azzouz A., Sakly M. et al. Effects of acute exposure to WiFi signals (2.45GHz) on heart variability and blood pressure in albino rabbits. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2015; 40: 600–5.
  13. Grigoriev Y.G., Grigoriev O.A., Ivanov A.A., Lyaginskaya A.M., Merkulov A.V., Stepanov V.S. et al. Autoimmune process after long-term low-level exposure to electromagnetic field (experimental results). Part 1. Mobile communications and changes in electromagnetic conditions for the population: need for additional substantiation of existing hygienic standards. Radiatsionnaya biologiya. Radioekologiya. 2010; 50 (1): 5–11. (in Russian)
  14. Sannino A., Zeni O., Romeo S., Massa R., Gialanella G., Grossi G. et al. Adaptive response in human blood lymphocytes exposed to non-ionizing radiofrequency fields: resistance to ionizing radiation-induced damage. J Radiat Res. 2014; 55: 210–7.
  15. Birks L., Guxens M., Papadopoulou E., Alexander J., Ballester F., Estarlich M. et al. Maternal cell phone use during pregnancy and child behavioral problems in five birth cohorts. Environ Int. 2017; 104: 122–31.
  16. Carter B., Rees P., Hale L., Bhattacharjee D., Paradkar M.S. Association between portable screen-based media device access or use and sleep outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr. 2016; 170: 1202–8.
  17. Aydin D., Feychting M., Schüz J., Tynes T. et al. Mobile phone use and brain tumors in children and adolescents: a multicenter case-control study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011; 103 (16): 1264–76.
  18. Ostrom Q.T., Gittleman H., Fulop J., Liu M., Blanda R., Kromer C. et al. CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2008-2012. Neuro Oncol. 2015; 4: iv1-iv62.
  19. Grigoriev Yu.G., Grigoriev O.A. Mobile communication and health. Electromagnetic environment. Radiobiological and hygienic problems. The prognosis of hazard [Sotovaya svyaz’ i zdorov’ye: elektromagnitnaya obstanovka, radiobiologicheskiye i gigiyenicheskiye problemy, prognoz opasnosti]. Moscow: Economica. 574 p. (in Russian)
  20. Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Energy and Health: Research Needs. Technical Report 178. June 2017.
  21. Sadchikova M.N., Glotova K.V. Clinic, pathogenesis, treatment and outcome of radiowave sickness. In: On the biological effect of electromagnetic fields of radio frequencies [O biologicheskom deystvii elektromagnitnykh poley radiochastot]. Moscow: 1973: 43–51. (in Russian)
  22. The Charter (Constitution) of the World Health Organization (WHO) (New York, 22.07.1946).
  23. Extremely low frequency fields: Environmental health criteria, No. 238. Geneva: WHO Press; 2007. 543 р.
  24. WHO; Geneva. http://www.who.int/peh-emf/publications/reports/ehcstatic/en/index.html WHO (2006) Fact Sheet № 299: Electromagnetic fields and public health.
  25. ICNIRP Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic and electromagnetic fields (100 kHz TO 300 GHz) International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection, 11 July 2018.
  26. IEEE (2004) (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), C95.6, IEEE standard for safety levels with respect to human exposure to electromagnetic fields in the frequency range 0–3 kHz, International Committee on Electromagnetic Safety (ICES).
  27. IEEE (2005) (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers), C95.1, IEEE standard for safety levels with respect to human exposure to radio frequency frequency electromagnetic fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz, International Committee on Electromagnetic Safety (ICES).
  28. Shandala M.G. Physical environmental factors in brain ecology. Gigiyena i sanitariya [Hygiene and Sanitation, Russian journal]. 2015; 94 (3): 10–4.
  29. Luk’yanova S.N. The microwave range electromagnetic field of non-thermal intensity as a stimulus to the central nervous system. Moscow: FMBC im. A.I. Burnazyana FMBA Rossii; 2015. 200 p.
  30. Izmerov N.F., Kasparov A.A., Mojkin Yu.V. et al. Hygienic regulation of factors of the production environment and the labor process. Izmerov N.F., Kasparov A.A., eds., AMN SSSR. [Gigiyenicheskoye normirovaniye faktorov proizvodstvennoy sredy i trudovogo protsessa]. Moscow: Meditsina; 1986. 239 p. (in Russian)
  31. Repacholi M. Health based standards and precautionary measures in EMF. Yezhegodnik RNKZNI-2008. Мoscow; 2008: 17–33.
  32. Comparison of international policies on electromagnetic fields (power frequency and radiofrequency fields). National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, RIVM PO Box 1. 3720 BA Bilthoven The Netherlands. January 2018.
  33. Controlled limits for electromagnetic environment. National standard of the people’s Republic GB8702-2014. Department of environmental protection. State administration for supervision, control and quarantine of quality. Beijing, 2014 (translated from Chinese).
  34. Letter of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine ref. No102/2266-5 from 09-12-2016.
  35. Order No. 1477 of November 27, 2017 of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine “On Amendments to the State Sanitary Regulations and Rules for Protecting the Public from the Effect of Electromagnetic Radiation”.

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML
Жүктеу

© Grigoriev O.A., Goshin M.E., Prokofyeva A.V., Alekseeva V.A., 2024


СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 37884 от 02.10.2009.